Showing posts with label ignorance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ignorance. Show all posts

Monday, December 31, 2007

Modes of Nature – The Plight and the Extrication

(When Krishna and His friends were threatened by a forest fire, Krishna swallowed the fire.)


December 30, 2007

Dear All,

Yesterday, I was transferred back in time to the days when I was very much entangled and harassed by the modes of nature. The eternity of the soul’s existence can be easily divided into two types of phases of existence – the ones in which the soul is not Krishna Conscious, and the ones in which it is. The former is an existence full of plight and the latter is the existence leading to the extrication from such plight and to the eventual establishment of the self beyond the dualities associated with the modes of nature into the realm of the eternal and blissful existence of the Kingdom of God. Before coming to Krishna Consciousness, making such an analysis would not have been possible. In that state of ignorance, all attempts at rationalizing the observations around are baffled by that unrelenting foe known as the Duality of material existence. This duality is characterized essentially by the personal definitions of the favorable and the unfavorable, and by the dissension caused between different individuals because of conflicting definitions of the same.

We were talking yesterday about different kinds of music – Indian Classical, Western Classical, Jazz, Rock, Metal, and so on… Three of us were there and initially I too was trying to establish by likes and dislikes as the “correct” ones. And inevitably, there was some disagreement amongst us. Since one always wants to be “correct”, a disagreement of this kind suddenly gives rise to at least a slight discomfort in the heart. And as soon as that happened I fearfully realized that I had been gullible and had been sucked into the world of duality once again by the stealthy forces of Maya -- that illusion-causing potency of the Lord which keeps everyone bound to this material world! After this, I lost interest in the discussion and while physically present there I was intellectually trying to get to the essence of what Krishna wants to teach me using this particular situation.

That feeling of discomfort immediately reminded me of the same feeling I used to get before coming to Krishna Consciousness. I remember how I cherished my likes and dislikes and maintained that I was the wisest of all by having those particular ones. That how liking Indian Classical music is better than liking Hard Rock. How tennis was a better sport than cricket. How the sporting heroes I loved were better than their sporting rivals. How the political views I harbored (though I was never really into politics ever) are better than those opposing them. Fortunately, I never cared too much about too many worldly things but of the few I did care for, I was quite strong about it. And of course, those were the ones that gave me most misery.

What is that misery? When one harbors strong likes and dislikes in this world of duality, inevitably one encounters opposing forces in the form of opposing ideologies, fans of other sports stars, patrons of another genre of music, readers of another kinds of books, and so on. In the face of such opposition, one tries to somehow establish within ones mind that what one is doing is the best. Such a mental adjustment is flimsy and once agitated it takes a long time for the mind to again get settled into a calm state. Unfortunately, the time it takes is so long that the probability of having a calm mind for a considerable duration of time is quite low, almost nil. All this eventually leads to the classic heinous philosophical conclusion that is the root cause of all sorts of nonsense that prevails in the modern world – “You do what you like, I do what I like. There is no absolute right and no absolute wrong.” This way everyone can freely do whatever one likes to do without worrying about what others think about it and more particularly, whether it is right or wrong.

This conclusion never ever satisfied my heart. But nevertheless, I had no other option but to accept it in the absence of a better answer. Given all the evidence around me, and without any understanding of the transcendental, this conclusion was all that I had. I even wrote a mail to one of my highly intelligent acquaintances that I accept that “Everything is Relative. There is nothing Absolute”. I was never happy about this philosophical conclusion… but I had no other option.

Truth alone satisfies the heart. If one is not satisfied with the Truth then it means either that what one thinks as Truth is not the Truth or that it is the Truth but that one is not harmonizing oneself with it. If harmonizing oneself with the Truth doesn’t satisfy the heart, then how will anything else for any considerable duration of time? Can building ones life on a flimsy foundation of untruth ever lead to prolonged satisfaction of the heart? Won’t one be harassed by unsuspected harsh surprises if one does not understand what is Truth and what not?

The Truth is that everyone in this material world has acquired a certain combination of the modes of nature based on their activities and desires from their past lives. Everything in this material world, including likes and dislikes, depends on the modes of nature acquired. So its not surprising that different people think different things to be right. The Truth also is that there exists a Supreme Person Krishna (God) who is the source of everything, from whom everything emanates, whose existence depends on nothing else, and on whom everything else depends. He is the supreme cause of all causes and is inexhaustible and unlimited. Krishna is thus the Supreme Absolute Truth. The Truth is also that we are all souls, eternal parts of that Supreme Absolute Truth Krishna and can be happy only if we base our existence on this knowledge. Unless one builds ones life on the foundation of this Truth, one is bound to be unhappy. Not only that, the ignorance of this knowledge of Truth gives room for other partial truths or even blatant untruths to take birth from imaginative brains and become known as truths. And this in turn gives rise to the popular ignorant conclusion that “You do your thing, I will do my thing.”

But, your thing and my thing can not be fundamentally different because you and I have the same fundamental identity (in Truth) as a part of the Supreme Lord Krishna. And thus your thing and my thing should be fundamentally same – to serve Krishna. This is the Absolute Law. Whatever be your material likes and dislikes, mould them in such a way so as to please Krishna! Then, despite your likings being different from mine on a material relative platform, they will be the same on the spiritual absolute platform. Both of us will like to serve Krishna but perhaps according to our different ways. Such is the unifying nature of the Supreme Absolute Truth Lord Krishna! Under Him all contradictions are resolved and hence all philosophical questions answered while completely satisfying the heart.

In fact, by working on such a spiritual platform, ones activities will cease being material. They will be transcendental to the modes of nature because by working only for the pleasure of Krishna, one can cut the strong ropes of the modes of material nature that bind one to this material world. Thus, one who is in the plight of being bound by these ropes can be extricated by using all his activities in the service of the Supreme Lord Sri Krishna. Thus he will gradually transcend the modes of nature and eventually achieve that supreme abode of the Lord in which there are not contradictions and everything is perfect and where once gone, no one returns back to this miserable existence of duality in this material world.

The ISKCON movement of Srila Prabhupada is facilitating such dovetailing of all resources in Krishna’s service all over the world and is thus doing the world the greatest welfare. Let us all join hands and help spread this movement all over the world like wild fire and please Srila Prabhupada and Lord Sri Krishna!

Yours in the service of Krishna,
Abhijit.

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Drive Out This Sinister Darkness!



Dear All,

What is better? A hundred years of abject poverty? Living on the streets or in the slums, being kicked around by the affluent, cheated off the basic necessities of life due to the greedy mentality of the others, getting no medical attention, with family members dying of hunger or cold, with no assurance of the next meal, a life full of darkness, hopelessness, and despair… Or, a life with all the basic bodily necessities fulfilled, a little bit left over for some modest luxury, kids going to school, nothing grand but a nice social acceptance, nothing enviable but a little self esteem, a life of dignity and with at least a little something to look forward to.

The answer is quite obvious, isn’t it. A life of dignity is undoubtedly better than a life of despair. Then why not help those whose lives are in despair and help them lead a life of dignity. Nothing stupendous, but at least better than hellish. Lets therefore do some social work! So they say…

Now consider another even simpler question. Which is better? A miserable hellish life of a hundred years followed by an eternity of unbridled pure bliss. Or, a hundred years of a life of dignity followed by another hundred years of a life with no guarantee of any lasting happiness and a certainty of many miseries followed by another hundred years of a life with no guarantee of happiness and a certainty of many miseries … and so on for eternity.

Again, the answer is obvious. A hundred years of hellish life is not too much of a price to pay for an eternity of sublime unlimitedly blissful life. So then, why do pro social work people pose the same following question again and again – Why are you talking about spirituality if they don’t even have food to eat and clothes of wear and a roof to sleep under? As if these were the more basic needs of the self than is spirituality. No! The most basic need of the self is spirituality. Because self means spirit and not body! Then why do they ask this question? Out of ignorance. Ignorance. Ignorance of the Truth.

The person who helps the soul but not the body is clearly better than the one who helps the body and not the soul. That is quite clear from the above discussion. So this is the principle. Now coming to practicality. And this doesn’t mean diluting the principle as many end up doing under this pretext. Practicality should refer to the day-to-day hands on process that will take one progressively closer to attaining the principle in actuality.

They ask – how can an empty stomach take to spirituality? A spiritually advanced person can surely do without much food because he has gone so much away from the bodily concept of his identity, but surely a spiritually bankrupt hungry person can never think that spirituality is more important than food. Agreed. But then, we are not advocating that one must not feed the hungry, but that it is not enough at all, if you see the bigger picture. Don’t they see that we are also aware of this question and we also understand this point? But just because of that we do not throw spirituality out of the window! Do they think that those who are propagating Krishna Consciousness are so dumb that they cannot understand this simpe point which even the most foolish person can understand?

So what is our program? Give everyone eternal blissful life and not just a hundred years of mediocre life with an uncertain eternity not taken into consideration. How? Educate everybody indiscriminately, and especially the leaders of the society – present as well as the potential future ones – about the Truth. And thus, by empowering them with the strength of knowledge mobilize the influential to influence others in a way such that everyone gets an eternal blissful life after their present more or less miserable life of a hundred years. Is it very difficult to understand that if the influential are illuminated by and convinced about the spiritual Truth, they will do more real social welfare work than those who are working towards the same goal (of social welfare) but in the darkness of ignorance? Can action in ignorance ever produce the same results consistently that are produced by action in knowledge? Is there any doubt as to which results will be more favorable?

And therefore, we have to preach. Preach! Preach! And drive away this deadly sinister darkness of ignorance by the torchlight of divine knowledge, the knowledge of the Absolute Truth.

Yours in the service of Krishna,
Abhijit.

Tuesday, April 3, 2007

Are they really interested in the Bhagavad Gita?


Hare Krishna.

I was just wondering how fortunate we are to get such a clear understanding of the philosophy of the Bhagavad Gita. There is no confusion in our mind about the goal of life, and about the goal of the Bhagavad Gita.

I always knew in my heart that the Bhagavad Gita is THE book! I knew it all my thinking life (i.e. after the mind developed enough to think about it), even before coming in touch with Srila Prabhupada. And I am feeling so fortunate this moment that I am actually in a position to study and understand the Gita as it is from a pure devotee (Prabhupada) of the speaker of the Gita. Not only that, I can practically see how, by the mercy of Prabhupada, I am actually, in a minute way, living by the Gita. And I can also see that if I continue to follow Prabhupada's instructions, I will be able to follow the Gita more and more in my life. What amazingly great fortune.

How many so-called followers of the Gita can say that they are following (or trying to follow) in truth their own understanding of the Bhagavad Gita? How many can really get that satisfaction of following the Bhagavad Gita? Will it be too wrong to say that only followers of Prabhupada can very happily and honestly claim that they are following the Bhagavad Gita? Can those who try to eek out some other conclusion (other than Bhakti) from the Bhagavad Gita ever get its real spiritual benefit? Can they really get advanced spiritually by keeping Krishna as a secondary factor in their understanding of the Gita? If yes, where are the examples? Are the people who say that all the Gita is teaching is "All Gods are equal" or "Do your work and dont worry about the results" getting any spiritual bliss? "All Gods are same" effectively means there is no Supreme Person. And "Do your work and dont worry about the results" means purely material consciousness with no spiritual principles present.

And about the other paths explained in the Gita (which also ultimately lead to devotional service to Krishna as also explained in the Gita itself)... who can follow these paths in this age? Can you follow Dhyana Yoga? Well, people dont really know what it is! Because they really havent studied the Gita! But those who have, can they follow it? ARE they following it? And then there are those who very proudly say that they are following Karma Yoga. Do they know that Krishna is instructing them in the Gita to surrender all their activities to Him? Do they know?? And I dont think there are many who say they are Gyan Yogis :) because just like Dhyana Yoga, Gyan Yoga also involves austerities! Can they do? Can they?

So then, despite all these facts, why not intelligently take up the path of Bhakti which Krishna mentions all over the Gita as being the best? Why not? What is the problem? Isnt it that they are not really interested? Isnt it that they dont really care about what the Gita says? And if so, isnt this the most unfortuante fact? This world is full of people who are so unfortunate that they have no interest in the teachings if the Gita. Even if some people seem to have, they really dont, because if they did, they would have intelligently chosen Bhakti as their way of life.

Our dearest Srila Prabhupada has made this highest process so very easily available to us. We should be so so grateful to him. We should vow to dedicate our lives to him without whom our lives would have been useless.

All Glories to Srila Prabhupada!!

I beg and pray to him that he takes me totally under his infallible shelter and makes me his most menial and insignificant sevant.

Your servant, Abhijit.